Now, world-renowned marketing strategists Al Ries and Jack Trout present this special Marketing Warfare is the indispensable book that wrote the rules-and. Now, world-renowned marketing strategists Al Ries and Jack Trout present this most powerful tactics and a fresh perspective on why marketing warfare is. Marketing Warfare has ratings and 59 reviews. Ahmad said: I read several others by Al Reis and Jack Trout and none wasted my time. I haven’t read the.

Author: Dushura Vot
Country: Barbados
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Art
Published (Last): 7 August 2016
Pages: 373
PDF File Size: 18.35 Mb
ePub File Size: 8.64 Mb
ISBN: 129-7-77784-937-9
Downloads: 85595
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tajora

A very easy read with very profound insight. Rather, smaller companies must recognize the principle of force and attempt to win the battle by means of a superior strategy, not by brute force.

The reason for keeping the attack narrow is the principle of marketing warfare al ries jack trout a narrow attack allows the challenger to concentrate its resources in the narrow area, and in that area may present more force than the leader.

Marketing Warfare – Al Ries – Google Books

Ries graduated from DePauw University in with a degree in liberal arts and accepted a position with the advertising department of General Electric before founding his own trot agency in New York City, Ries Cappiello Colwell, in To win the marketing warfare al ries jack trout, the team must focus its efforts on outwitting, outflanking, or over-powering the other side.

In developing its strategy, the firm must objectively determine its position in the market.

Afterward, he got a job in General Electric’s advertising and training program. Jsck and Tactics Strategy can be developed using a top-down or a bottom-up approach. The strength of the leader’s position is of primary importance because the leader has the top position in the mind of the consumer, and it is this position that must be attacked.

Books by Al Ries. Lucky – marketing warfare has jac element of chance; a good strategy only makes the odds more favorable. Ries and Trout offer marketing warfare al ries jack trout following examples of product variations on which to base flanking moves:.


Marketing Warfare

Ries and Trout use truot example of two motels across the street from one another on a resort island. Jun 05, Anna rated it really liked it Shelves: Generally, this means one product rather than a wide range of products. Furthermore, the dispensing machines for Coke were designed for nickels only, so the price could not easily be changed. The Nature of the Battleground In military warfare, a battle often is named after the geographic location where it took place – for marketing warfare al ries jack trout, The Battle of Waterloo.

It also is preferable to expand trouy marketing warfare al ries jack trout than horizontally into new markets since laws prevent a firm from using its monopoly in one market to develop a competitive advantage in another.

The challenger then stands a chance of marksting a position in the consumer’s mind for that more narrow class of product. Being well-tuned to the trade is helpful since in their public speeches executives often provide clues about their stances on potential products.

Irish Creative Industries are thriving! As in military warfare, the appropriate marketing warfare strategy depends on the firm’s position relative to its opponents. Once this is done, a defensive, offensive, flanking, or guerrilla strategy can be selected depending on the firm’s position relative to the competition. When management declares that it is time to “redouble our efforts”, then the marketing battle has turned to hand-to-hand combat and is likely to end in defeat.

The leader usually has the resources to defend against an attack against its marketing warfare al ries jack trout, whereas there may be weaknesses inherent in the leader’s strengths that cannot be defended. I love the analagies in this book for basic marketing skills and techniques. The line at our counter is shorter. An absolute must read for anyone beginning to study marketing.

Hack and Trout tell the story of several famous battles in history that illustrate lessons of warfare. It beautifully lays down how one can find weakness in other’s strength classic example being Coca Cola with caffeine vs 7UP, broiled vs fried. General Motors successfully attacked Ford’s market leadership when it launched Chevrolet, Pontiac, Oldsmobile, la Marketing warfare al ries jack trout, each targeting a specific segment of the automobile market.


Le marketing est une guerre.

The number two firm’s best strategy marketing warfare al ries jack trout an offensive attack on the market leader if there is a large gap between the number marketing warfare al ries jack trout firm and number three. Oct 22, Katie rated it really liked it. Even if the new product has less profit margin and may reduce short-term profit, fies accomplishes the more important long-term goal of protecting the firm’s market share.

The marketing concept states that a firm’s goal should be to identify and profitably satisfy customer needs. The Battle For Your Mind, an industry standard on the subject. Ries and Trout further reinforce their marketing warfare principles with the “computer war”.

Marketing Warfare – Al Ries, Jack Trout – Google Books

Ries and Trout also use the “beer war” to illustrate marketing warfare principles. Also i want to admit a lot of interesting examples,based on real life,real companies,which products we use every day: Rather, Ries and Trout argue that to win the battle, a firm must successfully execute a superior strategy. It is not enough for you to succeed, others must marketing warfare al ries jack trout.

In warfare, when a battle turns to hand-to-hand combat, the advantage resulting from the strategic plan no longer exists. A more flexible challenger can use this fact to its advantage. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. However, there are potentially significant rewards if market share can be gained from the dominant firm.

The smallest firm probably does not have sufficient resources to launch any type of sustained attack. The number three firm is too small to sustain an offensive attack on a larger firm.